Tips for college-bound juniors and seniors

My mobility, consciousness, and overall energy sorely limited as I recover from surgery, I have been thinking: how can I make myself useful?  Is there anything I can do to help other people while in this state?

 (As an illustration, it has taken me scattered, lucid periods over four days to write this brief post.)

But given that school is starting soon, I thought I could maybe help my friends with high schoolers by passing along the advice I used to share with my upperclassmen when I was a teacher.  I'm no admissions counselor, but I helped many kids get admission and scholarships, so I think it is sound information:

Pay attention to your schedule and adjust if necessary. 

Colleges want to invest their openings and certainly their scholarship money on students who present themselves as worth the effort. They like students with a diverse set of interests and those who are clearly up for an academic challenge.

If your senior year consists of general-education English, math, and science courses and then four sections of gym (I've seen this specific schedule from an ostensibly "college-bound" senior), then you don't seem like a safe bet.

Make sure your schedule shows you want to take the toughest classes possible.  To have AP next to a class on the transcript, the course syllabus has to at least go through a perfunctory review by the College Board to prove it appears rigorous.  That AP designation shows you are ready and willing to do college-level work, even if the grades you receive in that course aren't straight A's.

Nothing substitutes for challenging core courses. If you want to go to nursing school, for example, it doesn't impress an admissions counselor if you are taking "Medical Terminology" while taking bare-minimum science and math requirements.

Once you have a challenging schedule, choose electives that look good and provide valuable skills. For example, in my experience, Journalism and Public Speaking courses are often considered "fun" classes by students, but they also can markedly improve your written and spoken communication.

Get FAFSA done quickly.

Financial aid is given out first-come, first-serve based on your eligibility.  I always suggested putting the FAFSA form in the place where your parents sit most of the time (kitchen table, bar in the kitchen, coffee table, whatever), and asking them to check it every day to make sure you have filled out everything possible.  The moment you have all the necessary information to fill it out completely, mail it in.

Be methodical in college acceptance test prep

Don't just keep aimlessly studying and re-taking the test.  With practice tests available online, at school, in your library, etc. look at the questions you are missing and start figuring out if there are patterns.  A tutor or teacher at your school can easily help you with this analysis.

For some sub-tests, this process can be hard.  The ACT Reading, for instance, essentially tests your ability to quickly process different types of profoundly boring passages; raising your score through mere test prep is not likely to do much if you aren't a strong reader.

However, for the ACT English test, another English teacher and I tutored one girl using this sort of error analysis and she raised her score 9 points between her 3rd and 4th attempts at taking the test.   This was only the most dramatic example, but I've seen plenty of students raise English and Math sub scores 3-4 points with just focused error analysis guided by a teacher.

There are other things I can share when I feel better, but  hopefully this will be a few valuable notes for those of you with upperclassmen thinking of college admissions. 

Nicholas Schmidle's Remarkable Article about Chris Kyle and PTSD

(c) 2013 Condé Nast. All rights reserved

I came across this incredible article via a story on (the now almost unbearably umbrage-laden and sanctimonious) Slate.com, but don't read their analysis--just read this story.

It is an investment if you don't often read long-form journalism, but it is an insightful narrative. We are so used to "journalism" that tries to force subjects into easy partisan narratives, it is striking when this writer characterizes Chris Kyle--a potentially polarizing figure--with an attention to detail that demonstrates real complexity.

It seems to me the author has some clear axes to grind about guns and militarism. But the presence of some level of bias doesn't worry me. As I vaguely remember from reading Hayden White in my grad school days, even taking on the conventions of the narrative form in telling the history of something, your decisions impart some bias. But Schmidle's willingness to primarily focus on the subject and the story is incredibly refreshing.

How to Choose a Barber

X Speaks

I am very happy the great Frank X. Walker was named the Kentucky Poet Laureate today. I met Frank during my time working for the Governor's School for the Arts and while I have always loved his writing (my high school students always deeply connected with "Why I Ring the Bell"), I also found him to be simply a profoundly thoughtful and passionate human being.

For Mr. Walker, I share this meager piece I published in Kudzu a few years ago, inspired by seeing him at a reading at Third Street Stuff:

X Speaks

On attending the Affrilachian Poets reading on April 17, 2009 in Lexington, Kentucky.

"Let us pray"

Mother patted my knee and bowed.

My flaking, bony joints rubbed one another

as my tiny fingers intertwined.

Reverend Staggs's voice swirled around the burnished pews,

pressed against the drywall and nails in the old Nazarene church ceiling.

The Word burrowed into my pores—

swelling behind my temples,

within each bone, each tendon of my tangled hands.

While unfamiliar voices shrieked supplication all around,

discordant, syncopated,

I clutched my pulse, throbbing in my neck.

Felt the Word, heard the words, shaped by his mouth.

Tonight, no altar, collection plate,

disciples hushed as they anticipate

and swirl the last spit of coffee in their cups,

watch another pastor rise.

My lids close upon his face

as his voice feels out the corners of the room.

The Word spoken aloud –

over the clinking silverware,

the murmuring laity,

the amens rising in my throat.

A Fridge Too Far

The only fake wood grain I've ever been
able to tolerate.

(Note: Unless you knew me in my twenties, this silliness is probably not worth your time. Consider yourself warned.)

People who knew me during my college days and early twenties know Jimmy.  Jimmy was my college dorm refrigerator. But that is like saying Lucille is some guitar B.B. King owns.

In the places I lived, Jimmy was the 4th or 5th roommate. He always greeted us at the door, happy to offer some aptly chosen beverage he had kept cold all day just for us.

When UK won its 6th and 7th national titles, he was there celebrating alongside us.

When I severed a tendon in my hand and trudged in from the emergency room at 3:30 A.M., he was there.¹

Whenever it is that we finally move to Lexington (have I mentioned recently there is a lovely home for sale on Windridge Drive?), he'll be along for the ride.

So, this morning, I headed over to GRC to pick him up from the classroom. The custodial staff had everything moved out of the rooms for floor waxing, so student desks, bookshelves, plastic totes, and television carts crowded the dark hallways.

I found the cluster of items from my room. Teacher desk. Table. 30 student desks. Three mismatched plastic chairs for those days when every student attended in my sections with 32 or 33 on the roster. My laughably jerry-built projector cart ².  I kept looking, but after 20 minutes of rifling through every pile of furniture, it was clear.

No Jimmy.

I couldn't find him.

I was certain he'd been stolen.  I rapidly went through all the stages of grief. Why hadn't I picked him up earlier? Just a few days earlier I'd glanced back at him when I picked up some books and a DVD, sure he would be untouched since waxing wasn't supposed to begin until July.

Noticed this sitting beside me as
I started writing 

Then, my sorrow turned to fury. I would review the security tapes. I would find whoever abducted him. I would tape his image to milk cartons.  I would contact his kidnappers and make them tremble with fear.  I pledged empty assurances into the ether: "Jimmy be strong, you survive... You stay alive, no matter what occurs! I will find you. No matter how long it takes, no matter how far, I will find you!"³

I walked all the way out to my car.  Then I realized Tee (the greatest custodian/running coach on the planet) would have needed to defrost Jimmy, probably in the bathroom.

That's where I found him.

To Wendell, Dave, Kevin, Bruce, Stu, and so many others, I assure you I shall be a better protector of our dear friend. For now, Jimmy basks in the sun of the driveway, drying out, waiting for another home, another electrical outlet, another day.


  ¹  In fairness, I should also note that Andrea was also there that night as the person who drove me home from the hospital, got my medicine for me, and ran every errand for me for days, but it was Jimmy who looked at me that night and somehow let me know that Hard Ticket to Hawaii was on television to make everything better.

²

This day, I needed the power strip on the cart to run the DVD
player and coax-RCA converter box I acquired because
the school's DVD player didn't work and the TV is coax only.

To all the people railing about how you give too much of your paycheck
on education: you must be mistaking yourself for a teacher.

What I Always Think When I Read Wendell Berry

Reading over Wendell Berry's Jeffersonian lecture, I have the same experience I've had time and again with his work.

He possesses a profound passion for and comprehensive philosophy about the earth--devoid of a trace of clichéd language or reasoning.

His economic views are, by contrast, littered with false dilemmas and a desire to broadly criticize capitalism in moral judgments that often simply don't apply.

In some ways, he appears cantankerous for the sake of being cantankerous.  He seems to think his stubbornness in the face of technological advancement requires no justification; it has merit simply because it stands as a counterbalance to others' thoughtless embrace of technology.

Above all else, my repeated experience with Wendell Berry's writing is the realization that it is simply astonishing. Astonishing.  Every word manifests his craftsmanship.  For my money, nobody breathing today who is writing essays in English composes more forceful, economical, and electric prose.

Surely, he is not simply writing beautiful sentences; he as, as Mark Bittman said in his recent interview, "an inspiration" to leaders and the person considering our relationship to the world in ways far more complex than are commonly discussed.

But, even if you are diametrically opposed to his argument, you cannot help but admit it is offered so fearlessly and so brilliantly that you must appreciate the mind that created something so remarkable.

Movie Review for GRC School Newspaper

Note: for a teenage audience and with a roughly 300 word length limit, but thought I'd share in case anyone was considering the movie.  Enjoy.


Anonymous (PG-13)

Reading Shakespeare is one of life’s true pleasures. Is it difficult? Sure. But if you give it time, you get to encounter true brilliance.

But a small, vocal set of scholars reject the idea that such brilliance is possible from William Shakespeare—the poorly educated son of an illiterate glove maker.  They insist it must be a cover up, with Shakespeare being a front for some cultured, well-educated nobleman.  Literary lip-synching, if you will.

The new movie Anonymous promotes a popular candidate for these conspiracy theorists: Edward de Vere, the Earl of Oxford.  According to the movie, de Vere had been forced to hide his passion for theatre because drama was considered a low-class profession.

The film suggests de Vere (who, conveniently, had drafts of Macbeth and Hamlet just gathering dust in his office) got his catalog of plays anonymously performed in London as part of a complicated plot to determine England’s next king. 

The film’s mood is quite dark, and it could take a page from Shakespeare’s (oops, de Vere’s) playbook and include more comic relief.  The main humor comes at the expense of Shakespeare himself, who is reduced to a nasty, buffoonish character who takes credit for de Vere’s plays and tries to cash in on his undeserved fame. 

However, Anonymous has some redeeming qualities.  Beyond the political intrigue, there is a twisted romance plot and well-staged swordfights.  The film shines in its depiction of the raucous, interactive experience of seeing a play in Shakespeare’s time. 

But does Anonymous present a convincing argument? Should I tear down my classroom's Shakespeare posters and replace them with paintings of de Vere? 

Not quite. Nearly all scholars believe the historical evidence that indicates Shakespeare wrote the plays.  While the de Vere theory is interesting, it is ironic that the filmmakers argue a complex, bizarre political conspiracy is somehow easier to believe than the notion that some poor kid from Stratford just happened to be born a genius.